1998-03-13 - Fortify

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: d1ca24187a9a641f336d0e7908e7b00f6154a5d95f030640b038752b665acac8
Message ID: <199803130603.HAA04734@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-03-13 06:03:15 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 22:03:15 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 22:03:15 -0800 (PST)
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Fortify
Message-ID: <199803130603.HAA04734@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tthe remarkably hackable nature of  Netscape's "weak" crypto has been marveled
at here and in the press, but has no one else speculated on how this state of
affairs came to be?  I, for one, would like to thank the anonymous cypherpunks
toiling in the bowels of Netscape.  An amazing feat, achieving world-wide
distribution of millions of copies of strong crypto, the Feds all unknowing.  
Does anyone here _not_ think this was the deliberate act of one or more
cryptoanarchists?

Thread

• Return to March 1998

• Return to “andrew fabbro <afabbro@umich.edu>”
• Return to “David Honig <honig@otc.net>”
• Return to “mgraffam@mhv.net”

• Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”

• 1998-03-13 (Thu, 12 Mar 1998 22:03:15 -0800 (PST)) - Fortify - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1998-03-13 (Fri, 13 Mar 1998 09:45:30 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fortify - David Honig <honig@otc.net>
    • 1998-03-13 (Fri, 13 Mar 1998 11:14:36 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fortify - mgraffam@mhv.net
  • 1998-03-13 (Fri, 13 Mar 1998 11:17:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fortify - andrew fabbro <afabbro@umich.edu>