From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
To: ichudov@algebra.com
Message Hash: 04e19f1f8aa5e12d35b1ddc010258d79ffe158cf685a5c323dda49379c928bfe
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.980408102115.28363B-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Reply To: <199804081221.HAA18238@manifold.algebra.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-04-09 04:34:48 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 21:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 21:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: ichudov@algebra.com
Subject: Re: Cost of Ak manufacture
In-Reply-To: <199804081221.HAA18238@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.980408102115.28363B-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> > >So, the question is, it is realistic to expect that AK s will be
> > >manufactured here? Will the control freaks be able to stop it?
> >
> >
> > While 7.62x39 might become hard to find, the common US military and NATO
> > calibers (7.62NATO, 5.56, and 9mm) will be widely available.
>
> Al, you can make AKs in .223. There is no problem with that. So your
> objection is valid, but not insurmountable.
>
> - Igor.
Or make AK's in 7.62 NATO. As I recall, there was an AK variant
(Valmet??) available in 5.56 NATO and 7.62 NATO years ago.
-OrdnanceMonger
Return to April 1998
Return to “Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>”