From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org (Rabid Wombat)
Message Hash: 0b87670655c9743527d4529b3efd8383f6b5fb686b03df0d21a6379c8e3d994e
Message ID: <199804090458.XAA25250@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.980408102115.28363B-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
UTC Datetime: 1998-04-09 05:00:18 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 22:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 22:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org (Rabid Wombat)
Subject: Re: Cost of Ak manufacture
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.980408102115.28363B-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Message-ID: <199804090458.XAA25250@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Rabid Wombat wrote:
> > > >So, the question is, it is realistic to expect that AK s will be
> > > >manufactured here? Will the control freaks be able to stop it?
> > >
> > > While 7.62x39 might become hard to find, the common US military and NATO
> > > calibers (7.62NATO, 5.56, and 9mm) will be widely available.
> >
> > Al, you can make AKs in .223. There is no problem with that. So your
> > objection is valid, but not insurmountable.
> >
>
> Or make AK's in 7.62 NATO. As I recall, there was an AK variant
> (Valmet??) available in 5.56 NATO and 7.62 NATO years ago.
>
Yugoslavian AKs were in .308. I've seen those, they are slightly bigger
than the regular aks. There are some chinese guns in 5.56.
Anyway, caliber is not a problem and not an issue. The issue is
possibility of producing cheap reliable fun guns for the general public.
- Igor.
Return to April 1998
Return to “Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>”