1998-04-02 - Re: regulating the internet – clarification

Header Data

From: Ken Williams <jkwilli2@unity.ncsu.edu>
To: Jennifer DePalma <jdepalma@cato.org>
Message Hash: b38b2af163f8b1224fa2f69f152cf930d7771115f799f70e640e87b8958885d2
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980402161030.10822A-100000@c00069-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu>
Reply To: <199804022018.PAA23047@cato.org>
UTC Datetime: 1998-04-02 21:21:23 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 13:21:23 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Ken Williams <jkwilli2@unity.ncsu.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 13:21:23 -0800 (PST)
To: Jennifer DePalma <jdepalma@cato.org>
Subject: Re: regulating the internet -- clarification
In-Reply-To: <199804022018.PAA23047@cato.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980402161030.10822A-100000@c00069-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Jennifer DePalma wrote:

>To clarify:  I'm serious about this question, if for no other reason than I
>am editing a paper that basically claims it is impossible to regulate the
>internet.  I wish that were true, but I'm not sure I buy it.  Any input is
>most appreciated.

I am serious about my answer too.  My answer is "no".

To clarify:  I do NOT think it is feasible "to regulate the Internet".
The feds don't have enough clueservers to keep up with the technology and
the growth.  Only Fidel Castro could single-handedly regulate the
Internet, but he still doesn't have Internet access (besides that AOL
account), so that's a moot point.  Trying to "regulate the Internet" is
like the government trying to regulate an individual's bowel movements.
Ex-Lax does a better job, but still can't do it right.

Just say no to government sponsored prostate exams and body cavity
searches.

Ken 







Thread