From: attila <attila@hun.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 09:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jean-Francois Avon <jf_avon@citenet.net>
Subject: Re: Banning privacy: A radical proposal
In-Reply-To: <199806241458.KAA01546@cti06.citenet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980624160038.424A-100000@hun.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Jean-Francois Avon wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Jun 1998 00:38:06 -0500, William H. Geiger III wrote:
> 
> >And if they really want to save some children why don't they shut down the
> >multi-billion dollar infanticide industry known as abortion. Why are these
> >medical hacks allowed to do to children what they would be jailed for
> >doing to a dog? Perhaps because it serves nicely with the elitist goals of
> >population control (need to keep the number of niggers, bean pickers, and
> >white trash down to a controllable number) not to mention that their
> >pockets are well lined by the hacks.
> 
> Hey William, that's called "woman freedom to choose".  Woman right precedes the 
> baby-that-might-be rights for she is the sine-qua-none condition for the baby-who-might-be 
> to exist.
>
    as I said, I am personally against abortion, but your point is
    absolutely correct: it is "the freedom to chose" on the part of
    the woman who must carry the _potential_ child to term  --and,
    yes, the woman is the 'sine qua non' condition.

    what the absolutists in the Right to Life movements do not
    understand, and refuse to accept, is that they have _no_ God
    given right to tell another what they can or can not do that
    does not _directly_ infringe on their own rights; as a
    consequence, the fanatics believe they have the God given
    right to legislate morality --and then there are back alley
    coat hanger abortions where the nascent mother is placed
    at an unacceptable risk.

    and, there is nothing sadder than an unwanted, often fatherless, 
    child.

	attila out...

and you better believe the following are indisputable truths....

> Definition:  FACISM: n.:  a political and economic movement, strongly nationalistic, 
> magnifying the rights of the state as opposed to those of the individual, in which 
> industry, though remaining largely under private ownership, and all administrative
> political units, are controlled by a strong central government.
>         -------------------------------------------------
> "One of the ordinary modes by which tyrants accomplish their purpose, without resistance, 
> is by disarming the people and making it an offense to keep arms".  - Joseph Story, U.S. 
> Supreme Court Justice.
>         -------------------------------------------------
> "1935 will go down in history! For the first time a civilized nation has full gun 
> registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will 
> follow our lead in the future!"  
> 					-Adolf Hitler, April 1935
>         -------------------------------------------------
__________________________________________________________________________
    go not unto usenet for advice, for the inhabitants thereof will say:
      yes, and no, and maybe, and I don't know, and fuck-off.
_________________________________________________________________ attila__

    To be a ruler of men, you need at least 12 inches....
    There is no safety this side of the grave.  Never was; never will be.