1998-09-22 - Re: This is a listed crime?

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
To: attila <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 1c8d531e0a6a7d38508caabb0047aba60a6e68379bdb8a62c429bb61886ee392
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19980922231122.00907100@idiom.com>
Reply To: <199809211700.MAA17197@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-22 17:33:45 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 01:33:45 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 01:33:45 +0800
To: attila <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: This is a listed crime?
In-Reply-To: <199809211700.MAA17197@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980922231122.00907100@idiom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 05:50 PM 9/21/98 +0000, attila wrote:
>    "I dont know nuthin' 'bout it" 

Double negatives are your friend :-)

>    agreed, in theory. but how do you protect yourself when two or more
>    take the stand and swear under oath that you said: "......" or, even:

Yeah.  The times I've known the facts in cop-vs-citizen cases,
the cops have often been lying; I have to assume that they're often lying
in cases when I don't know the facts as well.  Of course, getting
somebody with that kind of attitude about cops onto a jury 
is somewhat unlikely, but occasionally you'll find neutrals.
				Thanks! 
					Bill
Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com
PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639





Thread