From: Petro <petro@playboy.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 12:52:41 +0800
To: Tim May <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Carl Johnson Warrant and Complaint
In-Reply-To: <199809090140.UAA29195@wire.insync.net>
Message-ID: <v03110702b21c46b59c74@[206.189.103.244]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 9:37 PM -0500 9/8/98, Tim May wrote:
>
>I suppose I agree with Eric's earlier point (snipped above) that mentioning
>the actual names of judges or FBI agents or IRS inspectors in rants about
>AP and AP bots is not a wise move. As with Bell's stuff, it makes for a
>case that _possibly_ these agents and judges had something to fear. Were I
>one of those judges or agents, I would tend to think that _possibly_ my
>life was in danger.

	One could point out that WE have reason to beleive that our lives
and freedoms are in danger.

>Best to leave rants at the general, protected speech level, and to not get
>into specifics of names and working habits of agents.

	That, and don't plant bombs that don't go off.

>But Toto will probably make a plea, as Bell did.

	He may be nuts enough not to.

petro@playboy.com----for work related issues. I don't speak for Playboy.
petro@bounty.org-----for everthing else.      They wouldn't like that.
                                              They REALLY
Economic speech IS political speech.          wouldn't like that.