1998-09-12 - Re: Clinton’s fake apologies

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: Jim Gillogly <jimg@mentat.com>
Message Hash: 88b4224706a4116a1f4185f37de543e0e87cb346632587a357c91dcb520251b1
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.980912080309.12595B-100000@well.com>
Reply To: <199809112128.OAA14441@zendia.mentat.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-12 02:03:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 10:03:59 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 10:03:59 +0800
To: Jim Gillogly <jimg@mentat.com>
Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies
In-Reply-To: <199809112128.OAA14441@zendia.mentat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.980912080309.12595B-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Jim Gillogly wrote:
> 
> If they <do> decide this is now a requirement for high office, I'd like
> to see all the Congresscritters who've had sex out of wedlock and
> concealed it take one step forward.  Shall we make hypocrisy in high
> office impeachable also?

A better question is: If Clinton is guilty of perjury and other felonies,
should he be impeached? 

If you don't think about lying about sex and related issues under oath
should be a crime, well, then change the law. But right now any form of
lying under oath is perjury, whether you like it or not. 

-Declan






Thread