1998-09-01 - Is it true that PGP 5.X is not secure?
Header Data
From: “Lars Weitze” <chromedemon@netcologne.de>
To: “Cypherpunks” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 8dd346a9f36e12107de3e0a0eaf0043c85cb60bafacd1937eb0953af3ebcaf9f
Message ID: <001001bdd5a0$b7cef800$7b0000c8@chrome>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-01 11:06:36 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 04:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Raw message
From: "Lars Weitze" <chromedemon@netcologne.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 04:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Cypherpunks" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Is it true that PGP 5.X is not secure?
Message-ID: <001001bdd5a0$b7cef800$7b0000c8@chrome>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
There are still rumors about that...
ChromeDemon
- --
"One dead is a tragedy, thousand deads are a statistic."
Karl Marx
e-mail: chromedemon@netcologne.de
http://chromedemon.home.pages.de
http://www.netcologne.de/~nc-weitzela2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 5.5.5
iQA/AwUBNevU0XnCsKPabtOfEQILcACfZ097WlD1pyA+2c7qv5RcyuYQJaEAoOmf
mvg3B9F9NNv7qrHljjgC1T+B
=J/8j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thread
Return to September 1998
- Return to ““Lars Weitze” <chromedemon@netcologne.de>”
- Return to “Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>”
Return to “Steve Bryan <sbryan@vendorsystems.com>”
- 1998-09-01 (Tue, 1 Sep 1998 04:06:36 -0700 (PDT)) - Is it true that PGP 5.X is not secure? - “Lars Weitze” <chromedemon@netcologne.de>
- 1998-09-01 (Tue, 1 Sep 1998 05:45:13 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Is it true that PGP 5.X is not secure? - Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
- 1998-09-01 (Tue, 1 Sep 1998 07:20:37 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Is it true that PGP 5.X is not secure? - Steve Bryan <sbryan@vendorsystems.com>