From: Steve Bryan <sbryan@vendorsystems.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 07:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Lars Weitze" <chromedemon@netcologne.de>
Subject: Re: Is it true that PGP 5.X is not secure?
In-Reply-To: <001001bdd5a0$b7cef800$7b0000c8@chrome>
Message-ID: <v03102801b211b1210b7a@[192.168.3.63]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>There are still rumors about that...
>ChromeDemon
>- --
>"One dead is a tragedy, thousand deads are a statistic."
>        Karl Marx
>
>e-mail: chromedemon@netcologne.de
>http://chromedemon.home.pages.de
>http://www.netcologne.de/~nc-weitzela2
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: PGP 5.5.5
>
>iQA/AwUBNevU0XnCsKPabtOfEQILcACfZ097WlD1pyA+2c7qv5RcyuYQJaEAoOmf
>mvg3B9F9NNv7qrHljjgC1T+B
>=J/8j
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Why pay attention to ill-supported rumors? The source code is publicly
available at www.pgpi.com. If there is a security issue then it can be
critiqued with reference to the places in the source code that are the
cause of the problem. If someone has done this, I haven't been paying close
enough attention and I apologize for ranting. If not, then I would dismiss
such claims as almost certainly baseless.

Steve Bryan
Vendorsystems International
email: sbryan@vendorsystems.com
icq: 5263678
pgp fingerprint: D758 183C 8B79 B28E 6D4C  2653 E476 82E6 DA7C 9AC5