From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 08:34:48 +0800
To: "Lynne L. Harrison" <lharrison@dueprocess.com>
Subject: Re: Clinton--Why I am Chortling
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980914032054.007d3b40@pop.mhv.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.980914063037.25313E-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Careful with your attributions. I don't believe Tim wrote what you said he
did.

As for Monica-Clinton, what appears to be the case doesn't matter in some
ideologies. Can meaningful consent be given with such a power imbalance?

-Declan


On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Lynne L. Harrison wrote:

> > On Sat, 12 Sep 1998, Tim May wrote:
> > 
> > There's also the idea popular in some gender feminist circles that the
> > imbalance of power in manager-employee relationships makes it impossible
> > for genuine consent to be given. Can there be any greater power imbalance
> > than the president of the United States and an intern? Where are the
> > feminist cries of outrage?
> 
> Could be because, at least from what I read in the report and from other
> sources, Monica came onto Clinton.  One could make the argument that the
> imbalance of power was the other way around ;)
> 
> On another note, instead of the report, it may be extremely more
> interesting to read:
> http://www.reagan.com/HotTopics.main/document-9.1.1998.1.html
> 
> I can't vouch for the veracity of all of those listed.  Of those
> individuals, however, with whom I am familiar by way of the media, it is
> accurate - and eerie, to say the least.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ***************************************************************************
> Lynne L. Harrison, Esq.         |  "If we are all here,
> Poughkeepsie, New York          |   then we are not
> mailto:lharrison@dueprocess.com |   all there."
> http://www.dueprocess.com       |      - old Zen saying
> *************************************************************************
> 
> DISCLAIMER:  I am not your attorney; you are not my client.
>              Accordingly, the above is *NOT* legal advice.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>