1998-10-28 - Re: MIB Subponeas

Header Data

From: “Jon ‘tex’ Boone” <tex@isc.upenn.edu>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 17208728b5d1ee9fd22c40c2008293ec67b5dd119daef0777cd5b94f3fa9a809
Message ID: <m3r9vs99w3.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19981026144314.038c6020@rboc.net>
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-28 12:24:49 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 20:24:49 +0800

Raw message

From: "Jon 'tex' Boone" <tex@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 20:24:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: MIB Subponeas
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19981026144314.038c6020@rboc.net>
Message-ID: <m3r9vs99w3.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




Tim May <tcmay@got.net> writes:
>
> * What about lawyer expenses? I know the line about "If you cannot afford one,
>   one will be appointed for you," but I've never understood what test of
>   "afford" is being used. If called before a grand jury, will they pay for a
>   lawyer? (E.g., if I decide I can't "afford" to pay some shyster to interpret
>   their legalese into ordinary English.)  (I assume there is some nonsense
>   about indigence, but can they force someone to prove he has no money?  What
>   if he money, but he needs that $5000 for school tuition more than he needs
>   to give it to Johnny Cockroach for a day's worth of shystering?)

  Tim,

    It is my understanding, from my brother in law (who is a practicing attorney
    in Pennsylvania) and from my sister's participation in a case in Texas that
    one does not have the right to have legal counsel present at a Grand Jury
    session.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------
Jon 'tex' Boone            Senior Network Engineer
ISC Networking          University of Pennsylvania
tex@isc.upenn.edu                   (215) 898-2477





Thread