From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
To: “Frank O’Dwyer” <shamrock@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 26bd73052790740646e0d70ad221d2260ec2072a2a41f97b09f2d750c43b3fe4
Message ID: <v03110708b242a937412d@[209.109.239.29]>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.981007180953.11287B-100000@netcom4>
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-08 17:24:50 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 01:24:50 +0800
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 01:24:50 +0800
To: "Frank O'Dwyer" <shamrock@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish sourcecode)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.981007180953.11287B-100000@netcom4>
Message-ID: <v03110708b242a937412d@[209.109.239.29]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 4:12 AM -0800 10/8/98, Frank O'Dwyer wrote:
>Lucky Green wrote:
>> The conclusion in the GNU vs. BSD/SSLeay/etc. license debate should be
>>clear.
>
>Well, it clearly isn't, as evidenced by the large number of fairly
>bright people arguing about it. :)
In the case of Open E <http://www.erights.org>, the choice came down to
which license Electric Communities was comfortable with. We ended up with
a Mozilla style license.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | If hate must be my prison | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | lock, then love must be | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | the key. - Phil Ochs | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Return to October 1998
Return to “Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>”