From: Soren <sorens@workmail.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 53f0aafa9dd26951caeddd9f52bec82086edffbb474a0eb7418dfa88c25b00d4
Message ID: <362ECBF9.E7E50ED0@workmail.com>
Reply To: <362E110F.30CA@lsil.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-21 18:41:42 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 02:41:42 +0800
From: Soren <sorens@workmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 02:41:42 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: UK police chase crooks on CCTV (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <362E110F.30CA@lsil.com>
Message-ID: <362ECBF9.E7E50ED0@workmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Michael Motyka wrote:
Technical:
Briefcase-sized EMP - fun idea but I don't know how to make it workable.
HV generator on the end of a stick - not too tough.
High power LASER to burn out CCDs - buy anonymously, nice, works from
a
safe distance.
What's needed are moles to leak detailed info on systems as they're
planned and installed. Then it would be easy to determine the weak
points. If each camera had to be guarded there would be a *huge* problem
just keeping the systems alive.
Low tech:
Paintball guns, doped with fluoric acid to etch the lens. Works
well on speed cameras.
Return to October 1998
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”