1998-10-21 - Separation of Socialism and State amendment

Header Data

From: Soren <sorens@workmail.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: ced5f14ce22beee3fe2ffa8826424a701260221c22fc30067e2e8f7fcb9371df
Message ID: <362ECF7F.E5E00744@workmail.com>
Reply To: <199810211803.NAA010.65@geiger.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-21 18:55:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 02:55:51 +0800

Raw message

From: Soren <sorens@workmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 02:55:51 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Separation of Socialism and State amendment
In-Reply-To: <199810211803.NAA010.65@geiger.com>
Message-ID: <362ECF7F.E5E00744@workmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html




William H. Geiger III wrote:
 
Well probably the most effective way is to just take out the command
and
control center. Even this would only be temporary as the government
would
just keep spending more tax money to replace everything and add more
security.
What we need is a mechanism to punish the politicians who go down the
Big
Brother path *and* the companies who are making big profits helping
them.
Simple check and balance alternative #4:
    Receive a buck of public funds as income, lose your
right to vote due to conflict of interest.  This applies to all civil
servants, politicians, military personnel, LEAs, welfare recipients, subsidy
recipients, medicare recipients, social security recipients, incarcerated
prisoners (they already have it)  -- and any others who have a vested
interest in the continuance of the gravy train. Hereafter referred to as
the 'Separation of Socialism and State amendment'. Perhaps they could all
form a union and tax each other for their common good.  Actually,
when you read the wording of the tax code, this is exactly what was intended
(http://www.tax-freedom.com), and is, in fact, the law.




Thread