From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
To: Ryan Lackey <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 3db55b4a58d54d48fc5a0ef41e8132c8237ed2e370a7f85a1bfa8a014001f6e4
Message ID: <19981205150002.B18744@eskimo.com>
Reply To: <19981205164842.B25348@arianrhod.@>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-05 23:24:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 07:24:18 +0800
From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 07:24:18 +0800
To: Ryan Lackey <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: (eternity) eternity using politics rather than economics
In-Reply-To: <19981205164842.B25348@arianrhod.@>
Message-ID: <19981205150002.B18744@eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, Dec 05, 1998 at 04:48:42PM -0400, Ryan Lackey wrote:
> When I was working on Eternity DDS stuff, I basically came to the same
> conclusion as Adam -- without anonymous bearer cash, you can't do
> a workable eternity implementation.
I'm not familiar with the latest eternity designs, but I wonder if they
could be extended to provide a global time ordering between the published
documents? If so perhaps the eternity service can be used to implement
b-money (see http://www.eskimo.com/~weidai/bmoney.txt) and the
chicken and egg problem would be solved at once.
Return to December 1998
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”