1998-12-08 - Re: (eternity) eternity using politics rather than economics
Header Data
From: pilgrim@laguna.com.mx
To: Ryan Lackey <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 9e9f327c5537ce442f8b15cfe2e09b5eab9db0e5d05224e6bac762c74d5450ee
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19981206185851.007b03f0@laguna-01.laguna.com.mx>
Reply To: <19981205164842.B25348@arianrhod.@>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-08 12:21:51 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 20:21:51 +0800
Raw message
From: pilgrim@laguna.com.mx
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 20:21:51 +0800
To: Ryan Lackey <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: (eternity) eternity using politics rather than economics
In-Reply-To: <19981205164842.B25348@arianrhod.@>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19981206185851.007b03f0@laguna-01.laguna.com.mx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 04:48 PM 12/05/1998 -0400, Ryan Lackey wrote:
At 04:48 PM 12/05/1998 -0400, you wrote:
>When I was working on Eternity DDS stuff, I basically came to the same
>conclusion as Adam -- without anonymous bearer cash, you can't do
>a workable eternity implementation.
Without abs you can't get a workable freedom implementation.
[...]
>As far as I can tell, having a good Eternity implementation is still
>blocked on getting a reasonable electronic cash system. There are
>some people in Anguilla...
...and elsewhere.
Thread
Return to December 1998
- Return to “Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>”
- Return to “pilgrim@laguna.com.mx”
- Return to “Ryan Lackey <ryan@systemics.ai>”
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”
- 1998-12-05 (Sun, 6 Dec 1998 05:12:07 +0800) - eternity using politics rather than economics - Ryan Lackey <ryan@systemics.ai>
- 1998-12-05 (Sun, 6 Dec 1998 07:24:18 +0800) - Re: (eternity) eternity using politics rather than economics - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
- 1998-12-06 (Sun, 6 Dec 1998 08:00:51 +0800) - Re: (eternity) eternity using politics rather than economics - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
- 1998-12-08 (Tue, 8 Dec 1998 20:21:51 +0800) - Re: (eternity) eternity using politics rather than economics - pilgrim@laguna.com.mx