1998-12-02 - Re: Matt Blaze arrested???
Header Data
From: Steve Bryan <sbryan@vendorsystems.com>
To: cryptography@c2.net
Message Hash: 4e40b89517b45a27dd8fa8923a21f161cca53c1d0db5c86868d2d0478dc73aa7
Message ID: <v03102801b28b42377f48@[204.1.1.65]>
Reply To: <19981202051225.1348.qmail@hotmail.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-02 19:58:33 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 03:58:33 +0800
Raw message
From: Steve Bryan <sbryan@vendorsystems.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 03:58:33 +0800
To: cryptography@c2.net
Subject: Re: Matt Blaze arrested???
In-Reply-To: <19981202051225.1348.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <v03102801b28b42377f48@[204.1.1.65]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Matt Blaze wrote:
>I'm afraid you're confused. Whoever this report was about, it
>wasn't me:
>...
Not a important question but isn't this the sort of message that would
benefit most from a PGP signature? I checked on the certserver and it did
locate a 512 bit key RSA key from 1993. I don't routinely sign or encrypt
my email but I remain curious about decisions others make. In a program on
NPR a few years ago I recall a few luminaries were ardently discussing the
issues involved in encryption but when asked late in the program how they
used encrryption themselves they all quickly said that it was just too
cumbersome.
Steve Bryan
Vendorsystems International
email: sbryan@vendorsystems.com
icq: 5263678
pgp fingerprint: D758 183C 8B79 B28E 6D4C 2653 E476 82E6 DA7C 9AC5
Thread
Return to December 1998
- Return to “Eric Cordian <emc@wire.insync.net>”
- Return to ““jim finder” <jim_finder@hotmail.com>”
- Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>”
- Return to “Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>”
- Return to “Steve Bryan <sbryan@vendorsystems.com>”
- Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”
Return to “Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?= <ulf@fitug.de>”
- 1998-12-02 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 13:43:00 +0800) - Matt Blaze arrested??? - “jim finder” <jim_finder@hotmail.com>
- 1998-12-02 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 14:34:31 +0800) - Re: Matt Blaze arrested??? - Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
- 1998-12-02 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 14:47:34 +0800) - Re: Matt Blaze arrested??? - Eric Cordian <emc@wire.insync.net>
- 1998-12-02 (Wed, 2 Dec 1998 15:28:32 +0800) - Re: Matt Blaze arrested??? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
- 1998-12-02 (Thu, 3 Dec 1998 01:37:52 +0800) - Re: Matt Blaze arrested??? - Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
- 1998-12-02 (Thu, 3 Dec 1998 02:32:09 +0800) - Re: Matt Blaze arrested??? - Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?= <ulf@fitug.de>
- 1998-12-02 (Thu, 3 Dec 1998 03:58:33 +0800) - Re: Matt Blaze arrested??? - Steve Bryan <sbryan@vendorsystems.com>