From: doug@netcom5.netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fecf25e685adc75624574bce4b43dae6591bd90d0335a0a4acadc21a8ebd7676
Message ID: <9309090454.AA02474@netcom5.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-09 05:02:11 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Sep 93 22:02:11 PDT
From: doug@netcom5.netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 93 22:02:11 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: REMAIL: pasting
Message-ID: <9309090454.AA02474@netcom5.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes) said:
>Yet RFC-822 is followed as much in the breach as in the observance.
Not only that, but it is woefully shortsighted. For instance, when
I reply to messages from email lists, sometimes I want to reply to
the list, and sometimes to the originator. The variations in
RFC-822 *compliant* email list headers are staggering; I have yet
to see any mail software that understands the variety of syntactically-
parseable signals that show that something is from a list, and allows
me to easily reply to either the list or the sender.
This is a technically trivial wish. It could be done, at least to the
95% mark, even as things stand. But NOOOOOoooo. :-)
Similar comments apply to saving things interactively. I'm about to
try procmail for non-interactive uses, but I still haven't seen a mailer
that lets me say e.g. "(save (from cypherpunks | to cypherpunks |
cc cypherpunks | Bcc cypherpunks | "From " cypherpunks) > savefile) & delete
Maybe I'm just email-challenged. Suggestions?
Doug
Return to September 1993
Return to “Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.fi>”