From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Message Hash: 49143b9184702f90b00518f54b01f7d467b29930bfd5f2b936fe780a2a8f5127
Message ID: <9310040250.AA27817@snark.lehman.com>
Reply To: <199310040022.AA06627@eff.org>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-04 02:54:43 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Oct 93 19:54:43 PDT
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 93 19:54:43 PDT
To: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Subject: Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)
In-Reply-To: <199310040022.AA06627@eff.org>
Message-ID: <9310040250.AA27817@snark.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mike Godwin says:
>
> Jim writes:
>
> > FidoNet policy has a statement allowing monitoring of all intransit
> > mail. I guess I'm going to have to dig my copy of Policy out of the
> > archives to post the relevant paragraphs.
> > Jim Cannell Internet: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org
> If all users of FidoNet systems read this and agree with it prior to using
> mail, then there's probably not an ECPA problem.
Mike;
Wouldn't users outside of Fidonet sending mail to Fidonet users also
have to agree to the terms, or is it sufficient for all Fidonet users
to have agreed?
Perry
Return to October 1993
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>”