1993-10-04 - Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)

Header Data

From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
To: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Cannell)
Message Hash: 5132d9f0750aa04ccadd52af15698523a99c8586025fceca1a041630b63633ee
Message ID: <199310040022.AA06627@eff.org>
Reply To: <43862.2CAF3D72@ns.fidonet.org>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-04 00:24:34 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Oct 93 17:24:34 PDT

Raw message

From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 93 17:24:34 PDT
To: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Cannell)
Subject: Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)
In-Reply-To: <43862.2CAF3D72@ns.fidonet.org>
Message-ID: <199310040022.AA06627@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


 
Jim writes:

> FidoNet policy has a statement allowing monitoring of all intransit
> mail.  I guess I'm going to have to dig my copy of Policy out of the
> archives to post the relevant paragraphs.
>  Jim Cannell      Internet: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org
If all users of FidoNet systems read this and agree with it prior to using
mail, then there's probably not an ECPA problem.


--Mike

Thread

• Return to October 1993

• Return to “Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Cannell)”
• Return to “Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>”

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>”

• 1993-10-03 (Sun, 3 Oct 93 14:09:00 PDT) - Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof) - Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Cannell)
  • 1993-10-04 (Sun, 3 Oct 93 17:24:34 PDT) - Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof) - Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
    • 1993-10-04 (Sun, 3 Oct 93 19:54:43 PDT) - Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof) - “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
      • 1993-10-04 (Mon, 4 Oct 93 04:34:39 PDT) - Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof) - Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>