From: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Cannell)
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 93 14:09:00 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)
Message-ID: <43862.2CAF3D72@ns.fidonet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In a msg on <Sep 30 12:15>, mnemonic@eff.org of 1:216/21 writes:

 m> From  owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
 m> From: mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin)
 m> To:   mdiehl@triton.unm.edu (J. Michael Diehl)
 m> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1993 11:45:09 -0400 (EDT)
 m> Cc:   yerazunis@aidev.enet.dec.com, cypherpunks@toad.com

 m> Well, there's no doubt that users of his system can agree to 
 m> allow the sysop to read their mail. But what about people 
 m> whose mail passes *through* his system on the way to somewhere 
 m> else?

 m> He has no agreement with them.


FidoNet policy has a statement allowing monitoring of all intransit
mail.  I guess I'm going to have to dig my copy of Policy out of the
archives to post the relevant paragraphs.

This is a very shortsighted policy.

Although financial restraints have curtailed my operations here making
a lot of this moot, my own policy allows all users and passthru mail to be
encrypted.  I neither monitor nor censor.



Jim
PGP key 1024/72C6A7
fingerprint = F5 74 29 3D 9C F8 A7 32  C7 98 F1 FE C4 85 FA 70

Protect your right to privacy. Say no to Clipper/Skipjack and key escrow

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLK8tCZuaN9X1csanAQFh6QP/bcfC21gOOnBMAAKoGTVON7u7NEda9Nqr
JtH1voGXQKArnRveoVffSTTlESjBC+yaBzi3t4Z1E37uELkd31r70M6OLIWDmw8o
QLvZXtoQJgCTzyzHUlY+K94XW3QznHllMVx2oYVJ53tKPn/HmrjwIN5Ml0orBU70
vhek/pyCXnk=
=f+Pj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--  
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
            (Gated via FidoNet Node 1:1/31)
 Jim Cannell      Internet: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org