1993-10-02 - Re: PGP in FIDO

Header Data

From: khijol!erc (Ed Carp)
To: pmetzger@lehman.com
Message Hash: fbfca385c8f6dd1a15b07fabef8728eadee6792902a4ae8f2d261c8cd9406fdf
Message ID: <m0ojGBH-00022EC@khijol>
Reply To: <9310022205.AA19553@snark.lehman.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-02 23:39:35 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Oct 93 16:39:35 PDT

Raw message

From: khijol!erc (Ed Carp)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 93 16:39:35 PDT
To: pmetzger@lehman.com
Subject: Re: PGP in FIDO
In-Reply-To: <9310022205.AA19553@snark.lehman.com>
Message-ID: <m0ojGBH-00022EC@khijol>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> Many sorts of status do not require that anyone GRANT you anything.
> Lets say, for example, that you live in state that permits common law
> marriage. In such a state, it is sufficient to think of yourself and
> your S.O. as married, and behave in that manner -- at that point you
> legally are married. (Note that common law marriages are now only
> possible in a few state -- 9 I believe.)

FYI, to be married in this way, you have to declare yourself in public as
married - introducing yourself as someone's husband or wife, for example, is
enough.  But being "common law" married, it's only "legally" - that is, if
one or both parties want to dissolve the marriage and don't want to exercise
their rights, they can just walk away from the marriage.

Texas is such a state.
-- 
Ed Carp, N7EKG			erc@apple.com			510/659-9560
                            an38299@anon.penet.fi
If you want magic, let go of your armor.  Magic is so much stronger than
steel!        -- Richard Bach, "The Bridge Across Forever"




Thread