From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Message Hash: 053077c090af10776105954c649f0609e25facc7fec23c884eec07b10c1ff2c5
Message ID: <9402151608.AA25156@andria.lehman.com>
Reply To: <199402151428.JAA29394@eff.org>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-15 16:21:42 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 08:21:42 PST
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 08:21:42 PST
To: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Subject: Re: Clipper and Traffic Analysis
In-Reply-To: <199402151428.JAA29394@eff.org>
Message-ID: <9402151608.AA25156@andria.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mike Godwin says:
>
> Does anyone here have any thoughts as to whether Clipper enables traffic
> analysis or tracing more easy than it normally is under Switching System
> 7? The reason I ask is, I have this sense that one reason the government
> likes Clipper is that the Law Enforcement Access Field enables agents
> to draw inferences about who's talking to whom and what they're saying,
> even without decrypting the actual communications.
>
> What do you think?
Normally, one can only determine the endpoints of a conversation. With
clipper, however, one can deduce a lot more, since when people move
around, go to hotels, phone booths, etc, you can still track their
clipper serial numbers.
Perry
Return to February 1994
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>”