1994-05-24 - Re: compatibility with future PGP

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
To: perry@imsi.com
Message Hash: d4cf430b4fc6926e7654a839ff602a2921cfae1b6a1ff00eb0cd35f4739b1bde
Message ID: <199405242041.QAA05953@bwnmr5.bwh.harvard.edu>
Reply To: <9405241954.AA02903@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-24 20:42:11 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 May 94 13:42:11 PDT

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 94 13:42:11 PDT
To: perry@imsi.com
Subject: Re: compatibility with future PGP
In-Reply-To: <9405241954.AA02903@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <199405242041.QAA05953@bwnmr5.bwh.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Perry writes:
| In any case, I don't understand why anyone would rationally oppose the
| distribution of Pr0duct Cypher's patches -- you don't have to use them
| if you don't like.

	I wasn't opposing them; I was suggesting that patching 2.5
would be more productive in the long run than patching 2.3

Adam


-- 
Adam Shostack 				       adam@bwh.harvard.edu

Politics.  From the greek "poly," meaning many, and ticks, a small,
annoying bloodsucker.






Thread