cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1994-05-25 - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?

Header Data

From: Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
To: (Blind List Only)
Message Hash: d8e5e2cfe6f69de4c89455971039dd776bd7db41a6669951b24295b11f089994
Message ID: <199405250506.AA01867@xtropia>
Reply To: <9405250243.AA03397@acacia.itd.uts.EDU.AU>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-25 05:25:02 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 May 94 22:25:02 PDT

Raw message

From: Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
Date: Tue, 24 May 94 22:25:02 PDT
To: (Blind List Only)
Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
In-Reply-To: <9405250243.AA03397@acacia.itd.uts.EDU.AU>
Message-ID: <199405250506.AA01867@xtropia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    From: mgream@acacia.itd.uts.edu.au (Matthew Gream)
    Subject: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
    Date: Wed, 25 May 94 12:43:46 EST
    
    Being Australian, I've not read the RSAREF conditions, but there is at
    the point that commercial use will still not be possible (at it would
    be under non-RSAREF 2.3a) when the RSA patent expires.

The GNU copyleft is supposed to disallow a lot of for-profit uses.

Zeke

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLeK/+xVg/9j67wWxAQGNqgP9FrqJ77ru0vH6mii7m9AElRfdqLvrFuum
7pRINtNpyW9qLtU8cQbdriAWJaxZX7CK70XkHPiSOXaIJ/A+pWrp4VW0f2F9vGBX
W3HkERqGT9ikOxDVHAq5Qk3IvvXss+Ms+QdzGSDRK1bAgzJLH/YYbsdpsXW4+fgi
raltpxGcZvg=
=i4MI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Thread