1994-05-25 - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fd7dc613490d09548d8df903b35330a90d3bcc27ebbd88d8f6745853ce57e96c
Message ID: <9405251735.AA04614@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9405251212.B19689-0100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-25 17:36:10 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 May 94 10:36:10 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 94 10:36:10 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9405251212.B19689-0100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Message-ID: <9405251735.AA04614@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



"Robert A. Hayden" says:
> I may be foolish, but...
> 
> What if (the cypherpunk community) comes out with a secure program that 
> doesn't rely on RSAREF?  Can it be done?  

I notice that you advertise a PGP 2.3a key.

Perry

Thread

• Return to May 1994

• Return to “anonymous@extropia.wimsey.com”
• Return to “Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>”
• Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
• Return to “Linn Stanton <lstanton@sten.lehman.com>”
• Return to “mgream@acacia.itd.uts.edu.au (Matthew Gream)”
• Return to “nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)”
• Return to “nelson@crynwr (Russell Nelson)”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”

• Return to ““Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>”

• 1994-05-25 (Tue, 24 May 94 19:41:31 PDT) - PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - mgream@acacia.itd.uts.edu.au (Matthew Gream)
  • 1994-05-25 (Tue, 24 May 94 22:25:02 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
    • 1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 04:42:20 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
      • 1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 07:55:10 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - anonymous@extropia.wimsey.com
        • 1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 08:12:46 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
        • 1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 11:35:46 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - nelson@crynwr (Russell Nelson)
  • 1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 05:16:23 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)
    • 1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 10:14:51 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
      • 1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 10:36:10 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
    • 1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 10:20:15 PDT) - PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
      • 1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 14:53:50 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - nelson@crynwr (Russell Nelson)
        • 1994-05-26 (Thu, 26 May 94 05:11:41 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
  • 1994-05-25 (Wed, 25 May 94 06:36:51 PDT) - Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ? - Linn Stanton <lstanton@sten.lehman.com>