1994-07-01 - Devil’s Advocate (again)

Header Data

From: pstemari@bismark.cbis.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
To: ravage@bga.com
Message Hash: 46671f92491137dba7e31f232bfb50ed23bc1738f63b1f3eb1c421318d0757c2
Message ID: <9407011852.AA28309@focis.sda.cbis.COM>
Reply To: <199407011815.NAA21951@zoom.bga.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-01 18:53:31 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 11:53:31 PDT

Raw message

From: pstemari@bismark.cbis.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 11:53:31 PDT
To: ravage@bga.com
Subject: Devil's Advocate (again)
In-Reply-To: <199407011815.NAA21951@zoom.bga.com>
Message-ID: <9407011852.AA28309@focis.sda.cbis.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>:

> Both of these are great but any evidence is inadmissable in court and 
> therefore of no use to a prosecutor.

"Your honor, we would like a (search warrant)(wiretap order)(arrest
warrant) for XXX based on the following information we received from a
confidential informant."





Thread