1994-08-06 - Re: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering)
Header Data
From: Spencer Mullen <cmullen@cs.oberlin.edu>
To: jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk
Message Hash: 290e87ddfb4a00f3c2e873360c96a4802ae4d4f6b8ba7a0a12f8c1465461e19e
Message ID: <199408061404.KAA02300@cs.oberlin.edu>
Reply To: <3778@aiki.demon.co.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-06 14:03:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Aug 94 07:03:51 PDT
Raw message
From: Spencer Mullen <cmullen@cs.oberlin.edu>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 94 07:03:51 PDT
To: jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering)
In-Reply-To: <3778@aiki.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <199408061404.KAA02300@cs.oberlin.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jim Dixon writes:
>Commercial remailers would probably be very concerned with legal
>issues, both criminal (pornography, etc) and non-criminal (copyright
>violations).
It would seem that remailers shouldn't be anymore accountable for
passing on illicit pornography than the postal services are today.
??
>--
>Jim Dixon
Thread
Return to August 1994
- Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>”
- Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
- Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
- Return to “jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk (Jim Dixon)”
- Return to “mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy)”
- Return to “Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>”
- Return to “Spencer Mullen <cmullen@cs.oberlin.edu>”
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”
- 1994-08-04 (Thu, 4 Aug 94 13:41:28 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering) - jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk (Jim Dixon)
- 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 20:36:16 PDT) - Latency vs. Reordering (Was: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering)) - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 21:12:03 PDT) - Re: Latency vs. Reordering (Was: Remailer ideas… - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
- 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 20:37:35 PDT) - Remailer ideas - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 22:11:28 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 22:55:16 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas - mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy)
- 1994-08-06 (Sat, 6 Aug 94 16:31:20 PDT) - Remailer ideas - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1994-08-06 (Sat, 6 Aug 94 10:24:49 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas - Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
- 1994-08-06 (Sat, 6 Aug 94 16:59:46 PDT) - Remailer ideas - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1994-08-08 (Mon, 8 Aug 94 08:40:54 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
- 1994-08-09 (Mon, 8 Aug 94 20:15:50 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1994-08-09 (Mon, 8 Aug 94 22:21:33 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
- 1994-08-09 (Mon, 8 Aug 94 20:15:50 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 22:55:16 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas - mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy)
- 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 22:11:28 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1994-08-06 (Sat, 6 Aug 94 07:03:51 PDT) - Re: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering) - Spencer Mullen <cmullen@cs.oberlin.edu>
- 1994-08-06 (Sat, 6 Aug 94 10:52:48 PDT) - Common Carriers and Illicit Shipments - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
- 1994-08-06 (Fri, 5 Aug 94 20:36:16 PDT) - Latency vs. Reordering (Was: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering)) - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)