1994-12-15 - Re: McCoy is Right! New Mail Format to Start Now.

Header Data

From: mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy)
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: cf3dab20c0bdbfeeedcbacc9c3cb08d98ee61d5c9d505fce5031b20c549fb819
Message ID: <199412152139.PAA25566@pentagon.io.com>
Reply To: <199412152133.NAA09727@netcom2.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-12-15 21:39:44 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Dec 94 13:39:44 PST

Raw message

From: mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 94 13:39:44 PST
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: McCoy is Right! New Mail Format to Start Now.
In-Reply-To: <199412152133.NAA09727@netcom2.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199412152139.PAA25566@pentagon.io.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tim wrote:
> Jim McCoy wrote:
> > On this particular subject you just haven't got a fucking clue what you are
> > talking about Tim.
> 
> So polite, so succinct.
>
> I'll remember this.

Please do.  There are a great many issues which your input and opinions are
a valuable contribution to the content of this list.  There are others
where you seem to make guesses as to where things are going without having
much of a leg to stand on.  Your MIME position hurts the widespread use of
cryptography because the advantages MIME gives to crypto far outweigh the
short-term costs associated with a systemic upgrade to a better method for
message transport and encapsulation.

jim




Thread