1995-01-21 - Re: jpunix.com and MX’ing

Header Data

From: “Craig A. Johnston” <caj@tower.stc.housing.washington.edu>
To: remailer-operators@c2.org
Message Hash: 6f6932436212db8a086b8a08b8e04770475d935305c740fb58cbe80d9ccbd7dc
Message ID: <199501211739.JAA00303@tower.stc.housing.washington.edu>
Reply To: <199501211728.LAA04757@jpunix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-21 17:39:55 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Jan 95 09:39:55 PST

Raw message

From: "Craig A. Johnston" <caj@tower.stc.housing.washington.edu>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 95 09:39:55 PST
To: remailer-operators@c2.org
Subject: Re: jpunix.com and MX'ing
In-Reply-To: <199501211728.LAA04757@jpunix.com>
Message-ID: <199501211739.JAA00303@tower.stc.housing.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



John A. Perry wrote:
> 
> First of all, I hope you don't mind me posting this to a couple of 
> lists as I find your questions pertinent and should be of value to many 
> readers.

Oops, I actually meant to direct it to the list myself, but forgot
to edit my headers.  Sure.

> 
> > To what extent can the operator of such a remailer really hide his
> > actual site?
> 
> 	It depends on the level of control the remailer operator has on the 
> site that the remailer operates from.

Assume root.

I know that you can set the 'masquerade as' thing in sendmail, but
of course any other SMTP agents you deal with are going to
correctly identify you when you 'HELO' and you're going to wind
up in the header, somewhere... (well, except smail 3.1, and probably
others.)  -- I'm assuming here the best one will be able to do will
be equivalent to a forgery via port 25.

--Craig






Thread