cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-01-17 - Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics

Header Data

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
To: Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
Message Hash: 814f554bf7ac8516d854aa872d07d17b5e19de95fa6a5bfb927ec82d79851f4d
Message ID: <9501172032.AA29703@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
Reply To: <Pine.HPP.3.91.950117105356.16699A-100000@cor.sos.sll.se>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-17 20:35:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Jan 95 12:35:13 PST

Raw message

From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 95 12:35:13 PST
To: Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
Subject: Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.91.950117105356.16699A-100000@cor.sos.sll.se>
Message-ID: <9501172032.AA29703@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


    Date: Tue, 17 Jan 1995 11:06:16 +0100 (MET)
    From: Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>

    This thread illustrates (at least if setup's like this are
    worthy of a place in Raph's list) that penet.fi is the safest
    way to go for the moment.

That depends on your threat model.  For most, chaining is safer than
penet.

    I would just hate it to have my head on the plate of a remailer
    operator who takes an interest in subtile ethical discussion of
    whether to sell me out or not.

Your characterization of what Homer has said strikes me as extremely
inaccurate.

			Rick

Thread