1995-01-17 - Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics
Header Data
From: Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 985f8f137b52635a5b8c2107f8616cd7cc24e08178a6b453d8eb273ef2e12ee3
Message ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.950117105356.16699A-100000@cor.sos.sll.se>
Reply To: <ab40e69a010210049530@[132.162.201.201]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-17 10:06:23 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Jan 95 02:06:23 PST
Raw message
From: Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 95 02:06:23 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics
In-Reply-To: <ab40e69a010210049530@[132.162.201.201]>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.950117105356.16699A-100000@cor.sos.sll.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
This thread illustrates (at least if setup's like this are
worthy of a place in Raph's list) that penet.fi is the safest
way to go for the moment. I would just hate it to have my
head on the plate of a remailer operator who takes an interest
in subtile ethical discussion of whether to sell me out or not.
Mats
Thread
Return to January 1995
- Return to “anonymous-remailer@xs4all.nl (Name withheld on request)”
- Return to “Brian Beattie <beattie@CSOS.ORST.EDU>”
- Return to “eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)”
- Return to “Homer Wilson Smith <homer@math.cornell.edu>”
- Return to ““James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>”
- Return to “jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)”
- Return to “Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”
Return to “Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>”
- 1995-01-17 (Mon, 16 Jan 95 19:25:58 PST) - Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics - jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
- 1995-01-17 (Mon, 16 Jan 95 20:12:21 PST) - Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics - Homer Wilson Smith <homer@math.cornell.edu>
- 1995-01-17 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 02:06:23 PST) - Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics - Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
- 1995-01-17 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 06:07:01 PST) - (none) Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics - anonymous-remailer@xs4all.nl (Name withheld on request)
- 1995-01-17 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 11:13:11 PST) - Re: (none) - Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
- 1995-01-17 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 12:28:42 PST) - Re: (none) - Brian Beattie <beattie@CSOS.ORST.EDU>
- 1995-01-18 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 07:54:12 PST) - Re: (none) - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
- 1995-01-18 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 08:03:30 PST) - Re: (none) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
- 1995-01-18 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 11:12:04 PST) - Re: (none) - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
- 1995-01-18 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 11:34:29 PST) - Re: (none) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
- 1995-01-18 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 11:12:04 PST) - Re: (none) - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
- 1995-01-18 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 10:17:09 PST) - Re: (none) - Brian Beattie <beattie@CSOS.ORST.EDU>
- 1995-01-19 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 19:52:16 PST) - Re: (none) - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
- 1995-01-18 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 08:03:30 PST) - Re: (none) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
- 1995-01-18 (Wed, 18 Jan 95 07:54:12 PST) - Re: (none) - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
- 1995-01-17 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 12:28:42 PST) - Re: (none) - Brian Beattie <beattie@CSOS.ORST.EDU>
- 1995-01-17 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 11:13:11 PST) - Re: (none) - Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
- 1995-01-17 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 12:35:13 PST) - Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
- 1995-01-18 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 18:35:45 PST) - Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics - Homer Wilson Smith <homer@math.cornell.edu>
- 1995-01-17 (Tue, 17 Jan 95 06:07:01 PST) - (none) Re: Abuse and Remailer Ethics - anonymous-remailer@xs4all.nl (Name withheld on request)