cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-01-04 - Re: Siegel and Lewis

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
To: Doug Barnes <db@Tadpole.COM>
Message Hash: 91bc9d1514d77891585f45824088d27f549c08ad14e422a1cd490b5fbb1619cf
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950104135455.7622A-100000@access3.digex.net>
Reply To: <9501041424.AA25564@tadpole.tadpole.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-01-04 18:55:56 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Jan 95 10:55:56 PST

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 95 10:55:56 PST
To: Doug Barnes <db@Tadpole.COM>
Subject: Re: Siegel and Lewis
In-Reply-To: <9501041424.AA25564@tadpole.tadpole.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950104135455.7622A-100000@access3.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 4 Jan 1995, Doug Barnes wrote:

> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 1995 07:42:57 -0600 (CST)
> From: Doug Barnes <db@Tadpole.COM>
> To: Raph Levien <raph@netcom.com>
> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Re: Siegel and Lewis
> 
> 
> Why is it that so many cypherpunks like the economist?
> 
> I learned recently that Eric is a big fan. So am I. You're certainly 
> not the first other cypherpunk to mention this. Weird. I mean, it's
> not exactly a radical publication... it just gets its *&#$*#$ facts
> right. Probably this is it.

I am also a fan.

I tend to focus on the subject matter economist prints.  I just find it 
more on target than most if not all of the major U.S. media sources.

> 
> Doug
> 
> 

073BB885A786F666 nemo repente fuit turpissimus - potestas scientiae in usu est
6E6D4506F6EDBC17 quaere verum ad infinitum, loquitur sub rosa    -    wichtig!

Thread