1995-02-09 - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

Header Data

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c2087ef49fdfa3701f97309ac08e16fc590bdda9e47a6564caa13521cdd9e2e4
Message ID: <199502092033.MAA25822@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <199502090633.WAA08858@netcom2.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 20:33:43 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 9 Feb 95 12:33:43 PST

Raw message

From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 95 12:33:43 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
In-Reply-To: <199502090633.WAA08858@netcom2.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199502092033.MAA25822@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

   Unlike the
   Digital Telephony Bill, which was on greased skids, [...]

As far as I have been able to puzzle out, the source of this claim
were the same parties that wanted to work a "compromise".  I have
never really trusted its veracity.

There was lobbying by the FBI, to be sure, but was there not also
lobbying for previous such bills (including S.266)?

Eric





Thread