From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c2087ef49fdfa3701f97309ac08e16fc590bdda9e47a6564caa13521cdd9e2e4
Message ID: <199502092033.MAA25822@largo.remailer.net>
Reply To: <199502090633.WAA08858@netcom2.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 20:33:43 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 9 Feb 95 12:33:43 PST
From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 95 12:33:43 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
In-Reply-To: <199502090633.WAA08858@netcom2.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199502092033.MAA25822@largo.remailer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Unlike the
Digital Telephony Bill, which was on greased skids, [...]
As far as I have been able to puzzle out, the source of this claim
were the same parties that wanted to work a "compromise". I have
never really trusted its veracity.
There was lobbying by the FBI, to be sure, but was there not also
lobbying for previous such bills (including S.266)?
Eric
Return to February 1995
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”