1995-02-08 - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

Header Data

From: jpp@markv.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: de5acae008e58866f19e4ab7eb25140c0010b32b516eb3481d4ed05fa5f039b3
Message ID: <9502072138.aa29510@hermix.markv.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950207230934.23719A-100000@mirage.skypoint.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-08 05:39:19 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:39:19 PST

Raw message

From: jpp@markv.com
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:39:19 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950207230934.23719A-100000@mirage.skypoint.com>
Message-ID: <9502072138.aa29510@hermix.markv.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Uh oh!  Egg on my face.  Will someone explain to me how the amendments
in S.314 make owners of ISPs or other computer systems liable for
'bad' data?  I apologize for my previous uncalled for (so it seams to
me now) ranting.

j*blushing*'

Thread

• Return to February 1995

• Return to “Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>”
• Return to “Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>”
• Return to “eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)”
• Return to ““James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>”
• Return to “jpp@markv.com”
• Return to “Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>”
• Return to “skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)”
• Return to “slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>”
• Return to “storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)”

• Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”

• 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 16:18:29 PST) - Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 16:40:39 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
    • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 19:34:36 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
      • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:02:56 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
        • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:06:51 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
          • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 22:35:58 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
            • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:07:31 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
            • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 12:33:43 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
  • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 20:46:01 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
    • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 20:48:24 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
    • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:12:51 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
      • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:39:19 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - jpp@markv.com
        • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 11:25:17 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
        • 1995-02-08 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 12:25:23 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@netcom.com>
          • 1995-02-10 (Fri, 10 Feb 95 14:59:11 PST) - Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act) - storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)
    • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:50:50 PST) - S.314, the “Pi Bill” - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
      • 1995-02-08 (Tue, 7 Feb 95 22:41:32 PST) - Re: S.314, the “Pi Bill” - Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>