From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@netcom.com>
Message Hash: faf38c42c54817c177200723e9cb1c5a3dc257a89f66eba44f0fb506471b4671
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950208002952.25082A-100000@mirage.skypoint.com>
Reply To: <199502080547.VAA28367@netcom11.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-08 06:41:32 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Feb 95 22:41:32 PST
From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 95 22:41:32 PST
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: S.314, the "Pi Bill"
In-Reply-To: <199502080547.VAA28367@netcom11.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.950208002952.25082A-100000@mirage.skypoint.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 7 Feb 1995, Timothy C. May wrote:
> Brad Huntting wrote:
>
> > Can anyone confirm this S.314 thing? It sounds an awful lot like
> > the "modem tax" and other urban legends.
> >
> >
>
> I wrote a post to comp.org.eff.talk in which I asked if "S.314" isn't
> just the "Pi Bill," in which pi = 3.14 is mandated to be pi = 3.00.
>
> S.314 I initially, for a minute or so, thought to be a put-on, a
> spoof. But the text lacked other signs of humor and had the trappings
> of a real bill. And then versions from reputable groups began to
> appear, so I was of course convinced it was real.
>
> If it's a spoof, it's too cute by half.
>
> --Tim May
I too thought it was a spoof initally. Hell, what Senator would be dumb
enough to name a bill this way if it was real. If I were trying to pass a
bill of this nature, it would be double-speak all of the way. But alas it
is true...And I thought the DT bill was bad.
Both of my congresscritters have been faxed and queried as to their
position. I'll inform the group when they fax me back. I would urge
others to do this. This will be unbelievably bad if we loose this one.
The ramifications on this bill are still hammering me in the head.
Sam
Return to February 1995
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”