From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 95 17:09:16 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: DD, pedaphiles, and Terrorists, oh my
Message-ID: <199509150006.UAA17827@book.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <9509141640.AA30602@zorch.w3.org>, hallam@w3.org wrote:


>We never used to see kiddie porn on the internet. The net would go
balistic if a 
>picture of a teen age nude was posted. Recently there has been a flood of hard 
>core paedophile material.

There has always been nude teens on the net. The kind of pictures the most
casual observer can take at any Mediteranian beach at any given day in the
Summer. There is no real kiddy porn readily available on the net.  I
looked long and hard. Its a red herring.

ANYBODY on this list seen some real kiddy porn on the net? I am talking
intercourse, etc., not scans of six year olds from the Sears catalog, or
naked boys building sandcastles on the beach.

- -- 
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMFjDkioZzwIn1bdtAQEB0gF+M67Ih6WLAl8J9bxPZOBmyjxKsxUczpqv
th5x7ZuILyuf/+bFTtcLKwbOnzZkIfpJ
=pjLL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----