From: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Message Hash: 4443d05832e39c4b9c1ba9173c8c67fbec9a1d073858f1259ca53bb1b6b5e23d
Message ID: <199601242303.SAA14589@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960123140650.00708e08@mail.interlog.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-24 23:25:17 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 07:25:17 +0800
From: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 07:25:17 +0800
To: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Subject: Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960123140650.00708e08@mail.interlog.com>
Message-ID: <199601242303.SAA14589@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In article <3105FBFC.4DC9@netscape.com> Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com> writes:
> The other way would be to export a binary with pluggable crypto,
> which is generally agreed to be regulated by the ITAR in the same
> way as software that actually contains crypto.
How did kerberos avoid this? The "bones" distribution of kerberos
without crypto was not regulated by ITAR, right?
David
Return to January 1996
Return to “Ulf_Moeller@public.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf Moeller)”