From: michael shiplett <walrus@ans.net>
To: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Message Hash: 480eb3bdf2816f26a93210daaf9affd75bacb270b950174b0bd58c893ee399d3
Message ID: <199601242318.SAA08161@fuseki.aa.ans.net>
Reply To: <199601242303.SAA14589@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-25 00:10:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 08:10:51 +0800
From: michael shiplett <walrus@ans.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 08:10:51 +0800
To: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
In-Reply-To: <199601242303.SAA14589@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <199601242318.SAA08161@fuseki.aa.ans.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
"dm" == David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu> writes:
dm> How did kerberos avoid this? The "bones" distribution of kerberos
dm> without crypto was not regulated by ITAR, right?
In the ``bones'' version not only was the encryption code eliminated
(e.g., the functionality of libdes.a), but the hooks to call such code
disappeared as well.
michael
Return to January 1996
Return to “Ulf_Moeller@public.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf Moeller)”