1996-01-28 - Re: more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks

Header Data

From: Bruce Murphy <packrat@ratbox.rattus.uwa.edu.au>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: acdd3ea0f3bd34bc3ed3784a16fc3e7e67de0fa1e201bf9a572b87204f465214
Message ID: <199601280510.NAA00268@ratbox.rattus.uwa.edu.au>
Reply To: <199601262011.MAA17408@netcom16.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-28 11:20:26 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 19:20:26 +0800

Raw message

From: Bruce Murphy <packrat@ratbox.rattus.uwa.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 19:20:26 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: more RANTING about NSA-friendly cpunks
In-Reply-To: <199601262011.MAA17408@netcom16.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199601280510.NAA00268@ratbox.rattus.uwa.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In message <199601262011.MAA17408@netcom16.netcom.com>, 
  "Vladimir Z. Nuri" wrote:
> 
> has anyone *tried* just ignoring the ITAR wrt crypto and seeing what 
> would happen? the gubbermint blindly thinks that cyberspace will 
> inevitably bring the wrath of four horsemen of the infocalypse, but aren't we
> equally as comic in assuming that violating the ITAR crypto sections
> will inevitably bring the 4 horsemen of the NSA??

One word...

Zimmerman.

I do agree with what you're saying though.

--
Packrat (BSc/BE;COSO;Wombat Admin)
Nihil illegitemi carborvndvm.












Thread