1996-01-31 - Re: No FV supporters?

Header Data

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: jsw@netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
Message Hash: c5399ab47c065a05601df39150077282e579e71a3f353d09a1e14e36ce447cbd
Message ID: <199601310119.RAA29332@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <310EB8B2.23B@netscape.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 15:30:00 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:30:00 +0800

Raw message

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 23:30:00 +0800
To: jsw@netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
Subject: Re: No FV supporters?
In-Reply-To: <310EB8B2.23B@netscape.com>
Message-ID: <199601310119.RAA29332@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>   I sent a description of an attack against FV based on replacing
> or hacking winsock to cypherpunks last night.  This attack seems
> to meet Borenstein's criteria of being as automated and implementable
> on a mass scale as their keyboard snooping attack.  So far I have not
> seen any response from FV.

	Would someone like to implement such a thing? That would be
"the cypherpunk way" of properly debunking FV's claims. I wonder if
Simson would put you on the cover of the SJ Merc for doing it..

-- 
Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-601-9777x3
Community ConneXion, Inc.			FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest")		sameer@c2.org





Thread