1996-02-01 - Re: No FV supporters?

Header Data

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: nsb@nsb.fv.com (Nathaniel Borenstein)
Message Hash: e66ed17f8be07412d582b697186018eff57ec6f6937331a405b10d02e7a7af49
Message ID: <199601312351.PAA08243@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <Al3zxOeMc50eNT2K8w@nsb.fv.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-01 01:26:22 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 09:26:22 +0800

Raw message

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 09:26:22 +0800
To: nsb@nsb.fv.com (Nathaniel Borenstein)
Subject: Re: No FV supporters?
In-Reply-To: <Al3zxOeMc50eNT2K8w@nsb.fv.com>
Message-ID: <199601312351.PAA08243@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> instead choose to unleash their software as a live attack, First Virtual
> reserves the right to track them down to the best of its abilities and
> prosecute them to the full extent of the law.

	Ever heard of remailers, Nathaniel?

	That aside, I wasn't proposing a full fledged attack that
someone would actually use to commit fraud, just an attack which
would expose FV for the self-serving FUD-spreaders which they are.

-- 
Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-601-9777x3
Community ConneXion, Inc.			FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest")		sameer@c2.org





Thread