1996-02-23 - Re: Schneier Attacks

Header Data

From: andreas@artcom.de (Andreas Bogk)
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Message Hash: 36ce35d12beffd8057a2ff50b2c4587540b991f178d9d2982cd565f787d028b7
Message ID: <y8awx5gw5yt.fsf@horten.artcom.de>
Reply To: <199602211940.OAA07616@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-23 06:06:05 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:06:05 +0800

Raw message

From: andreas@artcom.de (Andreas Bogk)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:06:05 +0800
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: Schneier Attacks
In-Reply-To: <199602211940.OAA07616@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <y8awx5gw5yt.fsf@horten.artcom.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>>>> "John" == John Young <jya@pipeline.com> writes:

    John>    Schneier says in a March SciAm brief on Kocher's timing
    John> attack: "In theory there are other attacks. You can measure
    John> power consumption or heat dissipation of a chip; timing is
    John> just one way."

And you could measure emissions, without even getting close to the
chip itself.

Andreas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAgUBMSu6x0yjTSyISdw9AQHHwAP/TrNlmlJkHvojhI0F2ZXykIfXWqJOSjD3
/EqWvhM3e/l3N2OnrMelAhJDf3c/m6E823vQpwYMIRbOwdRkBgEGM/WJGyAPpLqU
n0sgNrfD0E+zq9wKCw6HorFJc/UNIz6T3A9XGTv9ymK+eWdOjMdL0HLyedTdOgmh
l74jDaRIYzg=
=aMZl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread