1996-02-21 - Schneier Attacks
Header Data
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a309dd2e68e20e0f8f9589e31720ef661c3573392f2d6c5ba3664486a691dcde
Message ID: <199602211940.OAA07616@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-21 21:54:52 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 05:54:52 +0800
Raw message
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 05:54:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Schneier Attacks
Message-ID: <199602211940.OAA07616@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Schneier says in a March SciAm brief on Kocher's timing
attack: "In theory there are other attacks. You can measure
power consumption or heat dissipation of a chip; timing is
just one way."
Thread
Return to February 1996
- Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”
- Return to “andreas@artcom.de (Andreas Bogk)”
- Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
Return to “Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>”
- 1996-02-21 (Thu, 22 Feb 1996 05:54:52 +0800) - Schneier Attacks - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
- 1996-02-22 (Thu, 22 Feb 1996 22:46:46 +0800) - Re: Schneier Attacks - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
- 1996-02-23 (Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:06:05 +0800) - Re: Schneier Attacks - andreas@artcom.de (Andreas Bogk)
- 1996-02-23 (Fri, 23 Feb 1996 16:00:58 +0800) - Re: Schneier Attacks - Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>