1996-02-23 - Re: Schneier Attacks
Header Data
From: Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Message Hash: 701a573db222996ca261fbcc8014fd486e7aa3bb69c730b5f04ac685470a85fd
Message ID: <199602212217.QAA22922@softserv.tcst.com>
Reply To: <199602211940.OAA07616@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-23 08:00:58 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 16:00:58 +0800
Raw message
From: Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 16:00:58 +0800
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Subject: Re: Schneier Attacks
In-Reply-To: <199602211940.OAA07616@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <199602212217.QAA22922@softserv.tcst.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
John Young writes:
> Schneier says in a March SciAm brief on Kocher's timing
> attack: "In theory there are other attacks. You can measure
> power consumption or heat dissipation of a chip; timing is
> just one way."
You could also count the number of electrons, as well as their direction
across the chips.
Thread
Return to February 1996
- Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”
- Return to “andreas@artcom.de (Andreas Bogk)”
- Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
Return to “Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>”
- 1996-02-21 (Thu, 22 Feb 1996 05:54:52 +0800) - Schneier Attacks - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
- 1996-02-22 (Thu, 22 Feb 1996 22:46:46 +0800) - Re: Schneier Attacks - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
- 1996-02-23 (Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:06:05 +0800) - Re: Schneier Attacks - andreas@artcom.de (Andreas Bogk)
- 1996-02-23 (Fri, 23 Feb 1996 16:00:58 +0800) - Re: Schneier Attacks - Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>