From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 14:03:19 +0800
To: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Subject: Re: Anonymous remailers mentioned in CDA decision
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960613172259.27730B-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960613191656.14537A-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 13 Jun 1996, Michael Froomkin wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Jun 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:
> 
> > I think they would be unwise to appeal, but I can also see where the
> > political considerations would override that basic logic.
> > 
> 
> The unstated assumption, of course, is that the Justice Dept was really
> trying to win...  One wondered, at times...

Excellent point, though I think this would have been a personal decision
on the part of the parties involved rather than a institutional one.

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com