1996-06-14 - Re: Anonymous remailers mentioned in CDA decision

Header Data

From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Message Hash: b3f39bce32e80317841246625813b2fe128fc6f98a0a8fb720b69c7ebf4a3a14
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960613172259.27730B-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960613140439.13421A-100000@polaris>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-14 08:16:55 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 16:16:55 +0800

Raw message

From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 16:16:55 +0800
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: Anonymous remailers mentioned in CDA decision
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960613140439.13421A-100000@polaris>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960613172259.27730B-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 13 Jun 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:

> I think they would be unwise to appeal, but I can also see where the
> political considerations would override that basic logic.
> 

The unstated assumption, of course, is that the Justice Dept was really
trying to win...  One wondered, at times...

A. Michael Froomkin        | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law | 
U. Miami School of Law     | froomkin@law.miami.edu
P.O. Box 248087            | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | It's warm here.  And humid.






Thread