1996-06-13 - Re: Anonymous remailers mentioned in CDA decision

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8ebb11141dc635da021ddafbe9e295969d1963514e9b5b927e774e08ae581c6a
Message ID: <k4oFPD30w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199606121848.SAA05975@pipe2.ny1.usa.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-13 05:42:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 13:42:00 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 13:42:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anonymous remailers mentioned in CDA decision
In-Reply-To: <199606121848.SAA05975@pipe2.ny1.usa.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <k4oFPD30w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


jya@pipeline.com (John Young) writes:
> But still subject to the unpredictable Supremes, a Solomon cautioned, if
> DoJ elects to appeal.

This statute's language pretty much forces DOJ to appeal, even if they think
the law sucks.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread