1996-07-18 - Re: Surf-filter lists

Header Data

From: “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: 41d2f60b33b678c281189094bb00de0aa91aacb96229121fd557e51e47061e80
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960717142418.2660A-100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Reply To: <v01510103ae11a1bfffcd@[204.62.128.229]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-18 05:12:24 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:12:24 +0800

Raw message

From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:12:24 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: Surf-filter lists
In-Reply-To: <v01510103ae11a1bfffcd@[204.62.128.229]>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960717142418.2660A-100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Tue, 16 Jul 1996, Declan McCullagh wrote:

> More to the point, as I wrote at the end of the original CWD, it's a
> bait-and-switch maneuver. Go after porn, they say, but the censor political
> information.

ARGH!  I've been keeping quiet about this for a while, but I thing I 
gotta say something before I throttle my Zip drive...

<rant>A Private organization cannot "censor" anything.  The fundamental 
definition of the word require some agent of the government take action 
to censor.  To accuse Surf-Watch, net-nanny, AOL, MSU, AT&T, or whatever 
of "censorship" accomplishes nothing except to make us look the 
fool.</rant> 

I agree that the problem with the "bait-and-switch" filtering of net 
materials by these various filtering packages needs to be addressed.  If I 
want to protect my kids from seeing alt.naughty.pictures, I shoudl still 
be able to unfilter political and health speech.  The real problem isn't 
censorship, it's disclosure by the makers of filtering packages about 
what exactly their packages are going to filter for me and my family.  
However, in the upcoming war of filtering packages (and it will get ugly) 
trade secrets are going to make any company hesitant to reveal what it is 
they are filtering and what criteria they are using to determine if 
something qualifies.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: PGP Signed with PineSign 2.2

iQCVAwUBMe0jezokqlyVGmCFAQH0SAP+ONXs2f4GxjIrC6cp2sc9CgTrebL4cBWB
UqpH4H3UO0TiKZN4T6MGVC6kCA3OwQnd0DNC0f0D6+iZTPkwN228Am6ZH4+t9hZs
OrmCbZCiWZipLfT1gphIHqFHSqIQ506LkkGgLK0gjsS2ahrI+cNYJA3yYBviMkB1
zuj1KRJ+pMk=
=ddI5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
____           Robert A. Hayden      <=> hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu
\  /__     Finger for Geek Code Info <=>    Finger for PGP Public Key
 \/  /           -=-=-=-=-=-                      -=-=-=-=-=-
   \/        http://krypton.mankato.msus.edu/~hayden/Welcome.html

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GED/J d-- s:++>: a- C++(++++)$ ULUO++ P+>+++ L++ !E---- W+(---) N+++ o+
K+++ w+(---) O- M+$>++ V-- PS++(+++)>$ PE++(+)>$ Y++ PGP++ t- 5+++ X++
R+++>$ tv+ b+ DI+++ D+++ G+++++>$ e++$>++++ h r-- y+**
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------






Thread